Contracts
4th May 2019 - Frances Forward
Sources of Law/Contract/Tort/Procurement
Partnering and 'Modern' Contracts: PPC2000/NEC4
Compatibility of Design & Management
No civil codes or constitution
Most is 'civil law', Health & Safety is issues could be 'criminal law' - (small c)
Common Law = exist on the basis of custom, equity
Primary / Secondary Legislation
Primary (Acts of Parliament, First Instance)-> Town & Country Planning Act, Building Act, Architects Registration Act
Primary Building Act (Town & Country Planning Act)
Secondary Building Regs
Guidance Approved Document
Reversal of 'burden of proof'
Architect try to comply with AD, then Building Control needs to prove we don't comply
Local Democracy Act
Housing Grants, Construction & Regeneration Act
- Scheme for Contract...
International Distinctions
European - Civil Codes, Statute
Chinese - civil, socialist law
Islamic - religious
Law of Contract
Offer (Fee Proposal) + Acceptance (Letter of Appointment) = Agreement
Consideration = value surpassed between the parties (first payment e.g.)
Signed as Deed, exception to 'Consideration'
- 6 years liability
- 'Simple Contract'
Intention to create legal relations = circumstantial
Capacity = age, mental health
Authority = individual, straightforward company, who can sign
Breach of Contract
Remedy for breach = Liquidation of Damages
'Damages' as a legal term (plural)
- chronologically forwards
No penalty under the contract in English Law
Law of Tort
People not in contract with
Negligence, Nuisance, Defamation
- to be negligent different to Tort of Negligence
Tort of Negligence (all 3 to be present)
- Duty of Care
- Breach of Duty
- Damage (physical/economic/mental)
Liability in Tort
Remedy for tortious act
- Damages (backwards chronologically)
- similar to medical negligence, higher than Damages in Contract
- Position prior to tortious act... as far as possible
Procurement Parameters
Time - Speed/Certainty
Cost - Value/Certainty
Quality - Specification/Workmanship
Risk - Management
Perfectly possible to have high Quality and low Risk, Time, Cost
Contractual Concepts
Rights
Contractor's right to payment
Employer's right to performance within timescale
Type of Contract
- dependent on Client's needs
Traditional - Control Time? Risk?
Design & Build - Control Quality? Risk?
Management - Control Cost? Risk?
'Hybrid' - Variable Control? Risk?
-specialist architects/contractors and building type influence this choice
Form of Contract
Standard forms (ensures certain guarantees):
JCT
NEC
PPC2000
RIBA
ACE
Standard Form Amendments
Reasons for contemplating amendments
- sometimes legitimate, often not, risk shunting
Effect?
- not always predictable? Who drafts?
Bespoke?
- could be counter-productive... why?
Building Contracts
Traditional design<-->construction
D&B design-><-construction
Mgmt {design construction]
Professional Services Contracts
Services - clarity
Fees - calculation methods
Role of RIBA (plan of work) - management/co-ordination
Standard forms - RIBA Agreements, NEC PSC
resource based
Relationships with the client being recorded
- professional services + building (contracts)
Contractual Complexities (?)
Letters of Intent
- binding Contract? if properly drafted, yes
- could go into a Contract later, subsumed
- sue?
- 'intends to enter a contract with...'
- mere intent?
- cost and time
- limitations
Collateral Warranties
- Client <-> Bank (e.g) <-> (collateral warranty) Contractor
- Tenant / Freeholder - Contractor
- parallel liabilities
- identical duties? - class of people -> increase liability
- to whom are they owed?
- seek legal advice, no PI insurer
- Contracts Third Parties Act
Partnering
- Efficiency
- Improved Performance
- Existing suppliers - whole supply chain
- Intuitive - personalities matter
- Volontary - non-binding 'charter'
- Mandatory - binding contract
- Principles
- Trust - between all Partners
- Co-operation - not competition
- Mutual Gain - win-win
- Obligations, collaboration, communication, strategy
PPC2000
Larger projects generally
Key Principles
- Multi-party (only!) flaw - disputes/remedies
- must partner (scale of project)
- Principal Stages
- roles change, fore-see future events, flexible
- Consultants
- PPC2000 is vague on this
- Administration Role
- long-term commitment, senior employee (worth it)
- consultant -> (Project+Insurance) <- consultant
- VS (?)
- insurance -> (Project) <- insurance
NEC4
Black, Green, Purple, Mauve, Bright+Orange, Navy books
Any procurement method (Trad, D&B etc.)
Flexible tweaking (harder with JCT e.g.)
- Structure
- core clauses (Termination etc.)
- Main option (payment, procurement?)
- Secondary options (multiple currencies)
- Project Specific Info
- Contract Data
- Parts One (Client) and two (Contractors) - reciprocal, rights&obligations - at tender stage
- Project Documentation
- Works info
- Site info (risk!)
Project Management - key purpose of NEC
- Contract Assistance
Pricing Mechanisms
- incentivise
People
- flexibility of role (architect - pre-contract stage: designer - as a contract administrator - supervisor)
Change Control
- compensation, not variation, not drifting programme
- mechanism - time/money
Risk Allocation
- fixed or fine-tuned
Defects
- notification/correctio, not left to end
Completion
- status
Dispute Avoidance
- proactive, early warning procedure (make other parties aware - to avoid adjudication)
Jurisdiction
- location, clause data non-jurisdiction specific
Design
- responsibility
- who should carry?
- liability
- Standard of Care
NEC-contract
Circular diagram with various Documents around the perimeter
PPC2000-contract
Linear diagram with various Documents merging into one